The Life Of Adoor Gopalakrishnan Film Studies Essay

The Life Of Adoor Gopalakrishnan Film Studies Essay Moutatthu Adoor Gopalakrishnan Unnithan is a National Award winning Indian film director, script writer, and producer. Adoor Gopalakrishnan had a major role in revolutionizing Malayalam cinema. Adoor Gopalakrishnan first film Ones Own Choice (1972) pioneered the new wave cinema movement in Kerala. Over the last 40 years Gopalakrishnan has made films, short films, plays and documentaries in the Malayalam language spoken in the Kerala state located in the south west corner of India. All the 11 films he directed, from Ones Own Choice (1972) to A Climate for Crime (2008), were screened at several International film festivals and won him several National and International awards. He won National Film Awards fifteen times, Kerala State Film Awards seventeen times and also won several International Film Awards. He won the prestigious British Film Institute award for The Rat Trap (1981). Adoor Gopalakrishnan received the Padma Shri in 1984 and the Padma Vibhushan in 2006. The Nation honored Adoor for his valuable contributions to Indian cinema by awarding him the highest cinema award of India, the Dadasaheb Phalke Award for the year 2004. He is one among the very few Indian film makers who are well known in the international film fraternity. (Razdan ) During the 1970s a revitalized movement for good cinema called parallel cinema started in Kerala with Adoor Gopalakrishnan leading the cause. Parallel Cinema is an alternative to the mainstream commercial cinema, is a specific movement in Indian cinema, known for its serious content, realism and naturalism, with a keen eye on the sociopolitical climate of the times. A neo-realist film director by definition Adoor films tend to be much more than that. He involves the audience allowing them to become part of the film rather than just spectators. Adoors films and the characters in them are derived from real people and real situations. He uses his films to address underlying social problems presented in his home state of Kerala. Nothing is sugar coated, only the real stories of common social problems and how these problems affect people in their daily lives. His films dont necessarily try to solve these problems, but show the viewers the sacrifices and hardships those problems present to people that because of different social classes the viewers might not be aware of. By watching other peoples struggles, Adoor lets his audience experience and learn from these life struggles in hopes that the viewers wont repeat some of the mistakes that were made. Adoor Gopalakrishnan has been known as a director who completely dictates every fine detail of his films. From cinematography to acting, Adoor molds each frame of his films, inviting viewers to experience and discover new levels of thinking while still addressing the key overtone of the plot of his film. On the performance of actors in his movies, he stated that It is not the artists job to do the detailing. I do not want different interpretations of roles that may clash with each other. It has to be absolutely unified. According to Adoor in movies, the actor is not performing to the audience like the stage actor. Here they are acting for me. I am the audience and I will decide whether it is correct or not, enough or not. (Panicker) The film, Ones own choice (1972) is a film that portrays the middle class of Kerala as it transitions to a more modernist society. The emphasis of the film shows the economic and social crisis that young couples endure while trying to make a life for themselves. In the beginning there happy and together but as life plays out there world is turned upside down and in the end all we see is a woman, distraught, alone and overwhelmed starring into a unknown future by herself and her small child. This was the 1st feature film that Adoor directed and it went on to win many national and international awards. The film, Four Women (2009) tells the tales of four women in modern India. Each woman had their own roles in the film: the virgin, spinster, prostitute, and house wife. There is no real plot associated with this film or any type of closure enabling the Adoor to focus the viewers attention to the individual stories of the women. Each woman has her own social status in the film and their stories reflect their perspective in regards to their status during the time that they lived in. This film tends to show male domination of the women, but also gives way to a feminist rebellion brewing in each woman. Yet the film is not feminist in nature, since Adoor Gopalakrishnan is more concerned in portraying the era and the fine details it holds regarding the rituals and patterns of society than just to present a story regarding the power and will of womanhood. Irrespective of the fact, that he took his liberties in exercising what should be seen and what remains unseen and what remained- the ear thly nature of the film, which in all due, is as much powerful to what is portrayed (the role and growth of the woman). These women understand their roles, but are starting to believe that they can be something better. The film puts an emphasis on what constitutes living a life or just going through the motions of life. These women want to be something more than their social class structure allows them to be and without forgetting there place, they strive to be more than they are or at last dream they are. (Nitesh) Shadow Kill (2002) is the story of a hangman, Kaliyappan. The executioner is unhappy due to the guilt attached to his means of earning income. He realizes that the executions that he often carries out are a result of politics and not justice. To cleanse himself of the guilt, the King issues a pardon in the form of a clemency order, which deliberately arrives a few minutes after the hanging. However, Kaliyappan has no way to absolve himself from the guilt. As times change, the hangings grow increasingly few and far between. One day Kaliyappan receives orders to prepare for another hanging, which is due to take place in a couple of days. Kaliyappans preparations include rigorous prayers and penance; yet as the day draws closer, he becomes more and more perturbed. Just before the execution, Kaliyappan sits down with his friends for a traditional drink. To pass time, one of them starts telling a story about a young girl who was raped and murdered. As the story proceeds Kaliyappan begins to imagine the young victim to be his own daughter. The overpowering thoughts completely shatter his mental framework and he is unable to perform the execution. In this film Adoor shows the audience what its like to live in someone elses shoes. Would we make the same mistakes or come to the same reasoning as Kaliyappan did? As human beings are our lives controlled by fate or do we have control of what happens around us? These are some of the questions that after watching this movie become apparent. Adoor gives the viewers the opportunity to face these questions through the eyes of the Kaliyappan. The Rat Trap (1981) is a film about a middle-aged rural landowner, who has never had to do a thing for himself, loses the female relatives who wait on him, one after another, and watches helplessly as his estate, already ravaged by thefts and mismanagement, falls into decay. With his only known life in ruins he completely withdrawals to himself and becomes completely self absorbed, incapable of caring or showing any response to change. He is trapped in his own life. Instead of trying to find a way out he simply gives up all hope and does nothing. He is a man caught in a trap or as the movie title suggests a Rat Trap. This film went on to win many International awards and won the coveted Sutherland trophy at the 1982 London Film Festival. Adoor Gopalakrishnan films are drawn from real people, real lives. His cinema manages to frame details that often escape our everyday glance, turning the mundane into the magical, the commonplace into the startling. Adoors characters are extraordinarily varied. A couple living in defiance of society, trying to make ends meet; a rootless, rustic man unaware of his responsibilities; an ex-revolutionary wasting himself, sleeping and eating and drinking, much to the disgust of his old comrades; and a prostitute discovering love only to be separated from her lover by the guardians of society. He invites his viewers to open their minds to different experiences and life lessons that each character presents. As Adoor stated in an interview at the London Film Festival Ideas come from life, what you have been living through and what you have observed. Creativity defies simple definitions and explanations. The mysterious and unknown element of it is what make it ever exciting and interesting. (Bhaskaran) His work has motivated a new generation of film-makers to use their medium in bold new ways and to explore traditionally forbidden topics. Adoor Gopalakrishnan films are about humanity and what experiences we learn through living. He doesnt give the answers but his films guide us as viewers to an understanding that unfamiliar or uncertain aspects of life are just that, a part of life, which we can learn and grow from.

Essay --

Hydraulic fracturing, or â€Å"fracking† is a process in which natural gas and oil are extracted from shale rock layers deep within the earth by creating fractures below the earth’s surface. This is done by injecting a mixture of water, sand and chemicals at high pressure into wells. There are a number of environmental concerns related to hydraulic fracturing. One concern is the amount of water it takes to extract these resources – it could involve up to 5.9 billions gallons of water per day. In order for these fracking sites to get all that water 200 trucks are needed in order for this to happen. In drought prone areas of the country, this could create additional strain on the environment. The areas that are most prone to drought are areas like Texas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Virginia, and Kentucky along with other states surrounding them. Droughts take place all over the United States but most severely in the south as shown in this map. The dark, dark red are the states that have the most number of drought evens occur per year. The chemicals that are involved in the process are al...

Marketing Research †Final Exam Review Essay

Units 1-2 One question will be drawn from the following. This is the only material you need to know from the first two units except for material that has carried over into Unit 3. For instance, things like response types, population, sample, sampling distribution, etc. were covered in Unit 2. These concepts are important to understanding the Unit 3 material, so you need to know them. Studying real organizations is sometimes the most effective way to understand some marketing research concepts. In this course, class material has been illustrated through over fifty examples of real organizations. Most of the examples and cases have been covered in the first two exams. These possible long answer questions address examples and cases that have not been covered–there aren’t that many of that haven’t been covered! 1. In the Diageo Captain Morgan Gold case, what did management choose to do and why? (4 pts) What was the outcome, and why did it happen? (4 pts) What is the main lesson to take away from the case? (2 pts) 2. In the cloth vs. disposable diapers case, describe the background and results of the two studies. (8 pts) What lesson does this illustrate about using secondary data for marketing research? (2 pts) 3. In the Whirlpool case, what did marketing research studies show, and what did management decide to do? (6 pts) While management made a mistake in hindsight, their reasoning made sense from the production side—why? (2 pts) There are several takeaway lessons from this case. Name one. (2 pts) Unit 3 – There is only one possible long answer question, and here it is: Part 1 Do people in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Houston spend the same average amount on furniture each year, or are there differences between the cities? To answer this, a furniture company gathered data from people in the four cities. The supervisor proposes that they compare each pair of cities. So they would compare NYC vs. Chicago, NYC vs. LA, NYC vs. Houston, Chicago vs. LA, Chicago vs. Houston, and LA vs. Houston. If any of those pairs reveals a significant difference with 95% confidence (i.e., you can be 95% confident that the two groups are different), then they can conclude that the cities are not all the same. a. Briefly, why isn’t this a good way to analyze the data? (5 pts) The problem with running 6 pair tests is that there is still a 5% chance that the z- value we calculate will be a fluke that leads to a wrong conclusion. For each calculation done, there is an increased chance of error, thus we are six times more likely to get the wrong conclusion. This gives you a total of 1-(95/100) ^6 = 0.265 = 26.5% chance of improperly rejecting at least one of your six calculations. b. What is a better method? You only need to give the name of the method. (2 pts) The better method to use is called analysis of variance aka ANOVA Part 2 When conducting a chi-square test, the expected frequencies are equal to (Row total x Column total) à · Grand total How is this formula derived from mathematical and probability rules? Be detailed. If it helps to explain it by referring to an actual table, you can use the table below. (10 pts) | This formula is derived by each individual amount being assigned to each other individual amount. The probability of being in row A is A/E = 150/253 = .5929 = 59.29% The probability of being in column C is C/E = 135/253 = .5336 = 53.36% Thus when mathematically combining the probability of being in row A and column C is A/E x C/E = 150/253 x 135/253 = (150Ãâ€"135)/253 = 80.04 which is the same as B D C A E .5929 x .5336 = .3164 x 253 = 80.04

The Separate Legal Personalty and Piercing the Corporate Veil - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1178 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Business Essay Type Essay any type Did you like this example? BUSINESS LAW Types of Businesses A business refers to an organisation involved in the trade of goods, services, or both to consumers. Sole proprietorship is owned by one person and operates for profit. The individual has day-to-day responsibility for running the business however they can choose to operate singly or employ other people. The business is considered to be part of the individual and not a separate entity. As a sole proprietor, all responsibility, debts and liability are assumed by the owner. Therefore, it can be said that all assets of the business belong to the owner. A partnership is an entity with two or more individuals who share ownership of a single business. The partners should consult and have a legal agreement that sets out how profits will be shared, how partners can be bought out and what are the steps that will be taken to dissolve the partnership if needed. Time and capital must also be decided on. Each partner has unlimited liability for the risks, debts and actions the business incurs . Corporations are considered a unique entity, which is separate and apart from its owners. They are treated as individuals under the law. A corporation can be sued, it can be taxed and it can enter into contractual agreements. The owners of a corporation are referred to as shareholders. If ownership changes the corporation does not dissolve thus it has a life of its own. A corporation simply provides a way for individuals to run a business and to share in both profits and losses. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Separate Legal Personalty and Piercing the Corporate Veil" essay for you Create order Separate Personality A separate personality of a company means that the corporation is independent and distinct from the people who own or invest in them. In the case,Salomon V Salomon Co. (1897), Salomon conducted his business as a soletrader. Hesold it to a company incorporated for the purpose called A Salomon co ltd.The only members were Mr. Salomon, his wife and their five children. They shared the shares among themselves. Mr.Salomon loan moneys to the business. When the company failed the company liquidator contended that Mr. Salomon loan should not be honoured and that Salomon should be held responsible for thecompanyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢sdebts. Lord Halsbury LC stated that à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“it seems to me impossible to dispute that once the company is legally incorporated it must be treated like any other independent person with its rights and liabilities appropriate to itself, and that the motives of those who took part in the promotion of the company are absolutely irrelevant in discussing what those rights and liabilities are.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  From this case comes the fundamental concept thata company has a legal personality or identity separate from its members. Members have no interest in a companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢sproperty. Inthe caseMacaurav NorthernAssuranceCompany Limited (1925), M bought insurance for his timber estate while he was a sole trader. M later converted his business into a limited company butdid not make another insurance contract. A fire broke out in his timber estate. The insurance company refused Mà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s claim for compensation. It was held that the insurance was correct not to honour. The house of Lordsheldthat in order to have an insurable interest in property a person must have a legal or equitable interest in that property, Mà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s claims because M and his company were separate legalentities. Theloss of the timber wasthe companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s lossnot Mà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s loss. Lifting the Corporate Veil The corporate veil is the concept that separates the personality of a corporation from the personalities if its shareholders. It protects them from being personally liable for the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s debts and also other obligations. However, this protection is not impenetrable. Lifting this corporate veil is when the court disregards the corporate personality and look behind the real person who is in control of said company. The court comes to the conclusion that a companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s business was not or isnà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t being conducted in accordance with the provision of corporate legislation. Under the legal concept of piercing the veil, the court may hold the shareholders of the company personally liable for the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s obligations. Grounds under Which the Veil Is Lifted The corporate veil can be lifted in many cases. It can be lifted in the case of: Fraud/Improper conduct The courts will pierce the corporate veil when it feels that the company is being used to hide or conceal the identity of the perpetrator of fraud. In the case Gilford Motor Company Ltd v. Horne (1933), Mr. Horne was an ex-employee of the Gilford motor company and his employment contract provided that he could not solicit the customers of the company. In order to defeat this he incorporated a limited company in his wifeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s name and solicited the customers of the company. The company brought an action against him. The Court of Appeal was of the view that à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“the company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of business of Mr. Horneà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  in this case it was clear that the main purpose of incorporating the new company was to penetrate fraud. Thus the Court of Appeal regarded this case as a mere sham to cloak his wrongdoings. Tax evasion The court has the power to disregard corporate entity if it is used for tax evasion purposes. Once the company conducts in schemes of tax avoidance without any necessary legislative authority the veil will be lifted. Protecting public policy This occurs when there is a conflict between incorporated companies not adhering to public laws. Courts may pierce the corporate veil to protect policies of the public and also to help prevent transactions that may occur contrary to public policy. Avoidance of legal obligations This is where the incorporated company is made and used to avoid any legal obligation(s). The court may disregard the legal personality of this incorporation and assume that no company really existed. Enemy character In times of war, the court will be prepared to pierce the veil of the company to determine the nature of the shareholding. A company can be assumed as an enemy character when persons in control of its affairs are residents in an enemy country. In a case stated above the court may examine the character of the persons in real control of the company and then declare it to be an enemy company. In the case Daimler Co. Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co. Ltd, a company was incorporated in England for the mere person of selling in England. This company sold tyres which were made in Germany by a German company which held the bulk of shares in the English company. The holders of the shares remaining, with the exception of one, and all the directors were Germans who resided in Germany. During World War 1, the English company commenced action for recovery of a trade debt. It was held that the company was an alien company and the payment of debt to it would amount to trading with the enem y. Therefore, the company was not allowed to proceed with this current action. 1